|
Topics: 10 Posts: 91
|
 Created about 1 year ago
If you were starting a company what comp software would you buy and why? (I guess this should probably be a poll)
|
|
Topics: 0 Posts: 3
|
 Created about 1 year ago
This is an odd question to ask people because I think everyone is going to answer something along the lines of what ever they are using at the moment and also what your using the software to do. I learned Digital Fusion and After Effects. I like how Fusion works on specific scenes and footage more then AE, but AE is better for general work and is a little bit more intuitive although I hate how constrained it is. The guys that did CGI used Lightwave for along time so when they needed to use Maya for a project they didn’t like it much. I did get one solid answer about Lightwave and Maya from them in that Lightwave is a little more restricted but also easier to use, where as Maya has no restrictions, but then becomes infinitely more difficult to use. I don’t know if this helped you much but good luck with getting answers to what I think is a philosophical question.
|
|
Topics: 0 Posts: 5
|
 Created about 1 year ago
Nuke with AE and Imagineer for Support.
Nuke just rocks. It is the way of the future. I already own it with Furnace, Tinder and Keylight. But I also own AE, motor, mocha, combustion, and shake.
It is so fast and robust.
|
|
Topics: 10 Posts: 91
|
 Created about 1 year ago
Yeah I've got heavily into nuke. (expensive though) What is imagineer? I'll have to look into that.
|
|
Topics: 1 Posts: 5
|
 Created about 1 year ago
If the machines are going to be Macs, and there's not a huge amount of money floating around, I'd still go Shake to start with, with a view to transitioning to Nuke. In London, at least, the vast majority of freelancers know Shake over anything else.
|
|
Topics: 1 Posts: 14
|
 Created about 1 year ago
Are you speaking *hypothetically* there, Hugh... ;)
|
|
Topics: 1 Posts: 5
|
 Created about 1 year ago
It's ... uh ... entirely hypothetical... I've never even ... ahem ... thought about it in practical terms.....
<cough>
|
|
Topics: 0 Posts: 1
|
 Created about 1 year ago
Uhm...Nuke for comp + AE for motion graphics. I don't think you need anything more... Cheers,
Alessio
|
|
Topics: 0 Posts: 1
|
 Created about 1 year ago
Nuke is certainly the future, and it is awesome software. Shake will get you going and has a good base of users. After Effects is a great compliment to either of these and I would never want to be without it. The imagineer stuff is great. Silhouette for roto.
|
|
Topics: 4 Posts: 13
|
 Created about 1 year ago
Nuke is incredible for 3D comping 
|